Breakfast Meeting a Tremendous Success!





Calvin Tillman Speaks at Breakfast Meeting
in Memramcook, New Brunswick, Friday 21, Oct. 2011

Parents  Against Everyday Poison (PAEP) in co-operation with Shale-Concerned Citizens, Businesses and Environmental Groups of New Brunswick recently sponsored Calvin Tillman in a province-wide Tour of New Brunswick where Shale Gas Exploration activities in the province have rapidly made inroads in the past year.  In the photo we see Calvin at his first of seven appearances that would take him across the province from the 21st to 22nd of October.

The "By-Invitation-Only" Breakfast Meeting was held in Memramcook, N.B. where over 80 invited guests - consisting of MLA Liberal Opposition Officials, New Brunswick's Mayors, Councillors, Business and Community Leaders, and Leading Academics were in attendance.   Special thanks go to our Volunteer Staffers, Ushers and Consultants for the Memramcook Breakfast Meeting - Rachel Léger, Dorine and Pamphile Léger, Anabel LeBlanc, Anita Boudreau, Michael Stoneleigh-all residents of Memramcook,  and Shirlee and Gary Porter of Dieppe, whose efforts made the Breakfast Meeting a great success. Thanks as well to JP Bourque for his assistance.   Special thanks go to Thérèse Melanson for her generous offer of hospitality for Calvin at her B&B - Gite 3 Moulins during the Calvin Tillman Tour.

Large Turnout to Hear Calvin Tillman in Richibucto-New Brunswick.



Stephanie Stoneleigh -
of Parents Against Everyday Poisons
 Introduces Calvin in Richibucto

The Catholic Church Hall Richibucto - packed to capacity (300+) with standing room only.  I was honoured to be asked to introduce Calvin at this venue.

I was overwhelmed by the warm response to Calvin's visit in Richibucto.  Calvin's reputation had preceded him and he was met with a standing ovation before he even took the stage to speak.   I was totally overwhelmed by this warm reception that greeted Calvin and so proud to be a transplanted New Brunswicker too at that moment.   My husband and I had to leave shortly after the introduction but I understand Calvin was on the receiving end of another standing ovation at the end of his Presentation as well.   New Brunswicker's continue to amaze me with their warm hearts and appreciation.  

The Organizers there - Denise Melanson, Debra Hopper and Murielle Gagnon, assisted by Jerry Cook did an absolutely fabulous job of organizing the event and many weeks of hard work went into that effort - with everything from refreshments and pre-event publicity to media coverage.   I'm sure there are many who worked behind the scenes whom I do not know of but deserve our thanks none-the-less.    I have to say that the Team in Richibucto led by Denise M. and Debra H. did an altogether admirable job of putting together an outstandingly successful Speaking Engagement for Calvin. They deserve our heartiest congratulations for their accomplishment.

Is this What New Brunswickers Have to Look Forward To with Shale Gas Exploration?

New Report Reveals Toxic Air Near Natural Gas Operations
Citizen Samples Confirm Neighboring Communities at Risk

Gassed! Media Coverage

FOR RELEASE 7/12/11

Contact:  Denny Larson, Global Community Monitor, 415-845-4705

Josh Joswick, San Juan Citizens Alliance, 970-259-3583

Shirley McNall, San Juan County, NM Residents Worried About Our Health, 505-334-6534

Paul Light, Battlement Concerned Citizens, 970-285-7791

El Cerrito, CA-- Citizen sampling of air quality near natural gas production facilities has identified highly unsafe levels of toxic chemicals near homes, playgrounds, schools and community centers in Colorado and New Mexico. A new report issued by Global Community Monitor, GASSED! Citizen Investigation of Toxic Air Pollution from Natural Gas Development, details the air sampling results, environmental and public health threats with living amid the natural gas boom.

A coalition of environmental and community based organizations in Colorado and New Mexico collected nine air samples that were analyzed by a certified lab. The lab detected a total of 22 toxic chemicals in the air samples, including four known carcinogens, as well as toxins known to damage the nervous system and respiratory irritants. The chemicals detected ranged from 3 to 3,000 times higher than what is considered safe by state and federal agencies. Sampling was conducted in the San Juan Basin area of Colorado and New Mexico, as well as Garfield County in western Colorado.

“Carcinogenic chemicals like benzene and acrylonitrile should not be in the air we breathe – and certainly not at these potentially harmful levels," said Dr. Mark Chernaik, scientist. “These results suggest neighboring communities are not being protected and their long-term health is being put at risk.”

"My husband, pets, and I have experienced respiratory and other health related problems during the twelve years we have lived on Cow Canyon Road in La Plata County, Colorado. We believe these health issues are related to the air quality in our neighborhood and in the area,” said Jeri L. Montgomery, neighbor of natural gas development. Through the course of the pilot study, neighbors of natural gas production facilities documented chemical odors and sampled the air. Neighbors have appealed to local, state and national government agencies to investigate their air quality complaints, to limited recourse.

"We are very concerned about the total disregard for the health and welfare of the people "existing" near the sickening toxic oil and gas industry dumps located in neighborhoods such as the land farm on Crouch Mesa and the waste disposal facility in Bloomfield that are permitted and approved by the State of New Mexico and Federal EPA,” said Shirley McNall, member of San Juan County, NM Residents Worried About Our Health.

"Experts and agencies recognize more air monitoring is needed, but it's not happening," said Paul Light, co-chair of the Battlement Concerned Citizens. "Rather than wait for the government, we used the Bucket Brigade to collect much-needed air quality information."

The community and environmental groups in the San Juan Basin and western Colorado worked with Global Community Monitor, which trains community members living near industrial operations to run their own “Bucket Brigade” to sample their air. The Bucket Brigade has been used in 27 countries internationally. The bucket uses EPA methods for testing and an independent lab for air sample analysis.

Complaints about air quality have also surfaced in other states around the country, including West Virginia, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wyoming. Little information exists to educate and inform citizens about the chemicals being stored, emitted into the air, ground or water in close proximity to their homes. “People are getting gassed, and they don’t even know what is coming at them. The air monitoring provides crucial information in understanding what families are being exposed to on a day-to-day basis,” said Denny Larson of Global Community Monitor.

Federal loopholes in the Clean Air Act allow major corporations to circumvent basic protections that put public health first. US EPA is currently drafting new regulations to control and monitor air pollution from natural gas development. Congress is debating new legislation, such as the Bringing Reductions to Energies Air Born Toxic Health Effects (BREATHE) Act.

As regulation moves forward, GASSED! states that solutions are possible. The natural gas industry should invest in pollution controls to increase efficiency and reduce the amount of chemicals in the air. The report also calls for mandatory air monitoring at all natural gas operations and disclosure of chemicals used in the process to local residents.

In addition, the proximity of neighbors and wells is often too close. The report recommends a minimum quarter mile buffer zone between homes, schools and natural gas operations. This is similar to regulations enacted by Tulare County, CA on pesticide spray and St. Charles Parish, LA on industrial development. The report further states, “As the natural gas industry continues to grow, so will the number of families neighboring and affected by the emissions. Industry and government leaders have a unique opportunity to address public health and environmental issues. For coexistence between communities and gas industry to be possible, chemical exposure has to be immediately addressed.”

The full report can be downloaded at: Gassed! Full Report
Download the Appendix:   Complete Air Samples Results Spreadsheet

Full Air Sample Data Interpretation Letter from Mark Chernaik, Phd

Interview With Former Mayor of Dish, Texas

Former Mayor of Dish, Texas Speaks about

a Town Wracked by Fracking from Shale Gas Companies

Calvin Tillman has personally witnessed the destruction of a town’s peaceful lifestyle & verdant landscape along with the loss of health and well-being of the townspeople that so often happens as a by-product of Shale Gas Industry (hereafter referred to as SG Industry) – a town in which he worked heart and soul to help the townspeople, but in the end a town that was lost to Shale Gas. Here is the interview Parents Against Everyday Poisons had with Calvin Tillman 12 July 2011 (Denton, Texas)

PAEP: Calvin, I understand from my research that after many years of working as Mayor for the Town of Dish, Texas that you felt you had no other choice but to leave the Town due to on-going health issues with your young children. Have your children recovered their health now since you have moved?

CT: Yes, the chronic nosebleeds stopped as soon as we moved away from Dish, TX. We moved to Dish, TX when my oldest son was about 6 months old. He became asthmatic and when he had an attack it was serious enough that we had to go to the Emergency Ward with him. I don’t know that the conditions in the Town of Dish actually caused his asthma, but the conditions there certainly made his condition more severe.

PAEP: What were some of the changes you saw in Dish while you were there?

CT: Well, when we moved there drilling had already started in the area but the build-up of industry just increased while we lived there until finally it was basically a major Industrial Site with Compressor Site and Processing Plant and Gas Treatment facility – Bigger than the town. At this point there was constant noise, terrible odors, heavy equipment and heavy truck movement at all hours – not to mention the effect this industry was having on the health of the townspeople.

PAEP: I understand you entered municipal politics in Dish after you had been there a short time – as a councillor first and later became Mayor – correct?

CT: Yes, that’s right.

PAEP: What advice would you give to a town that might be threatened by the encroachment of the SG Industry – a place where Oil & Gas Co’s already have mapped out drilling rights?

CT: Well, someone has to organize.

PAEP: New Brunswickers live in a province where existing oil and gas interests appear to be in partnership with the newly arrived Oil & Gas Co’s from the United States and in addition the existing oil and gas interests own a fair majority of the Newspapers- it’s quite possible therefore, that the real nature of Shale Gas Drilling is not being reported in an unbiased fashion through the usual sources such as newspapers – What is your response to that situation?

CT: Well, you don’t live in a free country anymore if one person or family owns all of those things together. [Interjects this question] Have you folks seen the movie Gasland?

PAEP: Yes, some people in the area have seen that Documentary by Josh Fox. Mr. Tillman, do you do Speaking Engagements?

CT: Yes.

PAEP: What do you charge for that sort of thing; what’s involved exactly?

CT: Well, I don’t charge for speaking to a group. I have a small travel budget but we try to keep it for emergencies. I would basically need a place to stay and airfare paid to the location. I would be happy to talk to local officials to tell them of our experience at the municipal level. I have been to Quebec, Canada to talk with folks there who are concerned about Shale Gas Exploration.

PAEP: Yes, I’ve heard that the Quebec Minister of the Environment has grave doubts about the Shale Gas Technology and Quebec has backed away from Shale Gas Exploration. What would you say is the biggest obstacle to getting the word out on the dangers of Shale Gas Drilling aside from the unique media situation in New Brunswick that could be a detriment to alerting the public?

CT: Well, unfortunately there is apathy In society. People think that as long as everything is normal at home when they arrive home after work - then it’s not going to affect them.

PAEP: So they basically don’t realize there’s a problem until it’s in their back yard?

CT: That’s right. There are a lot of people who don’t agree with it and probably even most don’t agree with it - but they don’t see the need to get involved in it. But if you see anyone supporting Shale Gas, they are in the pay of the Oil and Gas Co’s.

PAEP: There’s a rumour that Amphetamine abuse is prevalent amongst Oil and Gas Industry employees. What is your response to that?

CT: Well – yes, there is some research out there that might point to that. There are often a lot of “imported workers” to the work sites. Rough-necks and Roust-Abouts can be a rowdy bunch. There have been reports of a lot of drinking and partying, hanging out in bars and reports of higher crime rates in Shale Gas areas. And of course, you tend to see drugs in that kind of environment as well.


PAEP: Are local job spin-offs a reality or the exception to the rule in this industry?

CT: Locals believe they will get gainful employment. The truth is that Shale Gas Industry imports workers and one reason is that SG Industry has lots of trained workers available. The jobs tend to go to transients – workers who have worked on other Shale Gas Sites in other places and have already been trained. The advantage to this is that the Oil and Gas Co’s don’t have to wait to train new recruits or pay for the training or wait for new employees to be trained. The SG Industry has a typical work system of 7 days on and 7 days off so it’s just as easy if not better to hire experienced workers from Texas as it is to hire locally. They are not likely to hire locals except for maybe general truck driving and back-hoe or bulldozing jobs. When I was talking to a group in New York they all expected to get jobs from SG Industry, but when I asked the crowd how many were Certified Pipeline Welders, nobody put up their hand. When I asked how many were trained at Pipeline X-Ray – again nobody put up their hand. They had no idea in that region that the promises of jobs were probably not going to materialize.

PAEP: What about the Tourism Industry in the local areas where SG Industry is present – what happens to those?

CT: Well, do you have any hunting or fishing grounds in your area? If you do then, Hunters and Sport Fishermen won’t hunt or fish in a gas field. Hotels? Well, first of all, the hotels will fill up with Rough-Necks – Tourists will not be able to find a room or will find that they don’t like the atmosphere that these workers can bring with them. B & B’s will stop getting business and Camp and RV sites will fill up with these workers because a lot of the SG workers have their own RV rig or motorhome.


PAEP: I’ve heard the expression that “BAD MONEY DRIVES OUT GOOD” – it sounds like that’s what will happen if Shale Gas Drilling comes to town? Is that your experience?

CT: Well, yes, that’s a good way of putting it.


PAEP: New Brunswick's Provincial Government is bragging that it has Regulations in place to protect our water wells and our properties – that water testing will be done before drilling starts and compensation will be given if wells are contaminated by their Drilling – What is your response to that?

CT: Well, I’m not sure what regulations can protect against some of the damages that Shale Gas Drilling produces. For example what’s your government’s plan for all the water that will be required by industry? This industry requires massive amounts of fresh water – where are they going to get it? and where will the government have the water dumped after it’s been contaminated by the drilling? – there are only two places – deep wells or lined pits. Research is showing that the lined pits pose a greater risk for contamination of wells. Shallow wells are more likely to be contaminated by this process. Do you have wells in your community?

PAEP: Yes, our whole community is on wells.

CT: Oh Dear.

PAEP: What about Water Testing? I’ve heard it said that New Brunswickers have to have their water tested by the test facility of the Oil and Gas Co’s choosing and that if a problem comes up with well water contamination NO OTHER water test will be considered valid – What is your response to that?

CT: Well, I don’t know the laws in Canada, but here in the U.S. we can have our own well water test done. I would suggest that if a Water tester hired by Oil and Gas comes to test your well water, that you have an independent test kit right there at the same time so that you do independent testing while the Tester is there. In other words, do a parallel test. It’s the intimidation factor. You can send for these tests by mail from the U.S. And I recommend Shaletest.org – our organization – we do water testing for folks who may not have the resources to pay for expensive testing.


PAEP: I’ve heard several times now that people who have been approached by Oil and Gas Companies have been asked if they will sign permissions for drilling on their land and when they decline the Oil & Gas Co’s simply tell them they can get at the gas horizontally anyway so they may as well sign a permission and get some money for themselves. Has this been the experience where you come from?

CT: Yes, this same “talk” is pretty much standard in the SG Industry. If they can’t convince someone to sign by being nice they resort to more threatening tactics.


PAEP: I’ve also heard that one homeowner here in New Brunswick sought out legal counsel when the Oil and Gas Co. approached him only to discover that his lawyer already had been put “On Retainer” by the Oil and Gas Industry. Is that something you’ve heard of before?

CT: Yes, this happens frequently. The Industry will go in and essentially “put on Retainer”(ie., place them under service contract to the O & G Industry) all the Law Firms they feel they need and they will do the same thing with the Environmental Testing Labs in the area as well. This is common.

PAEP: Well, thank you Mr. Tillman for taking the time to talk with me and for answering these questions.

∞ ∞ ∞

Parents Against Everyday Poisons© (Copyright 2011)

Paepcanada.blogspot.com

Email: paep@live.ca



PAEP Poster - "84,000 Chemicals"

84,000 - That’s the number of chemicals that are in the marketplace according to a report by CNN News (Everyday chemicals may be harming kids, panel told -- CNN Wire Staff -- October 26, 2010 1:21 p.m. EDT) - and only 200 of these 84,000 have ever been tested for human safety. The statistics are almost incomprehensible in their scope. If you are among those who believe that all chemicals are tested before they are released into the marketplace for sale, you are mistaken, but, you are NOT alone. The public has been lulled into a sense of safety – led to believe that the legal registration required by governments constitutes a scientific health and safety analysis for their effects on humans – when in fact, it does not!! Even the Medical Profession has been lulled into the belief of “safety”. One well-known Neurologist has actually admitted publicly that he was of the same belief.  During a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Superfund, Toxics and Environmental Health, Dr. Sanjay Gupta stated : "I'd always assumed government watchdogs had evaluated and signed off on the safety of the chemicals we encounter in our lives,".

Dr. Gupta was concerned as well that of the mere 200 chemicals tested, only five (5) have been banned. Dr. Gupta went on to say that these chemicals are not evaluated in accordance with the “precautionary principal” as is done in Europe. In North America, these chemicals are considered “Innocent until proven guilty” Gupta said.
While the truly “Innocent” are “Our Children”.  And it is because they are innocent that they deserve our protection. They are innocent of any wrong-doing. They have not created pesticides for the foods on our plates; they have not placed toxins in our laundry products. They have not created the chemicals that sell for profit. They are ultimately the Innocent Victims. We hold in Our Hands their precious lives, their present and future health, their greatness, their destinies, and their full potential !!  To see video of Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s testimony and read in greater detail about this issue click on the link below: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/10/26/senate.toxic.america.hearing/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn.
 Dr. Gupta – has made public his concerns about chemicals in our everyday lives - coming from a Medical and Scientific back-ground. But it is from his heart as a Father of three young girls that he speaks of his greatest concern for their health and their future. Maybe it’s time we were all concerned.

PAEP Poster - "Pesticides - Who Needs Em?"

Dr. Margaret Sanborn's 2003 Canadian Study Confirms Berkley Study that Children are More Susceptible to Pesticides even in the Womb.   One of Dr. Sanborn's more disturbing findings was that about 1/3 of Canadian children DO NOT possess the genetic make-up to detoxify common pesticides. Additionally Dr. Sanborn found that Maternal use of pesticides in the home during pregnancy was an accurate predictor for childhood Leukemia.
Below you will find a list of Dr. Sanborn's findings:
Reproductive Effects: The developing fetus has a critical period between 3-8 weeks gestation when major organs are being formed. This is the period when pesticides appear to have their strongest effect; it is also a time when women may be unaware they are pregnant.   

• A California Study showed that maternal pesticide exposure from 3-8 weekis  [gestation]  was associated with an increase in miscarriages due to major birth defects
• The Ontario Farm Family Health Study documented a 40-50% increase in early spontaneous abortions in farm women exposed to 2,4-D or atrazine type herbicides before conception.
• Research done in Montreal has shown that fetuses exposed to pesticides by maternal home and garden use during pregnancy have a 2 to 5 times [that is to say 200% to 500% greater] risk of developing acute lymphocytic leukemia by age 9.
• The risk of leukemia is highest if the child has one of two genetic subtypes which cause an inability to break down pesticides. This genetic subtype is not a rare occurrence; in the Montreal study it was present in 35.5% of children. In other words, about one-third of Canadian children are born with a specific inability to detoxify commonly used pesticides, and a corresponding increased vulnerability to adverse health effects including cancer. Cancer in Canadian children under age 15 has doubled over the past 25 years.

Dr. Margaret Sanborn is a rural family physician, Assistant Clinical Professor of Family Medicine at McMaster University, and a member of the Ontario College of Family Physicians Environmental Health Committee. (Excerpt: EHANS)

PAEP Poster - “Basketball Boy”

School-aged children are being negatively affected by chemicals including "scent" in ever increasing numbers. For some students a reaction to "scent" can precipitate an Anaphylactic Reaction.

Some schools such as Crescent Collegiate High School in Newfoundland, Canada have instituted a strict "no-scent" policy in parallel to bans on peanuts and other allergens in order to protect the health of their student populations.   Some children with severe allergies can go on to develop a condition called Multiple Chemical Sensitivities. Read what the National Fibromyalgia Association has to say about Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) and the severity of some "scent" allergies.

PAEP Poster - "Organic Garden"

How Does YOUR Garden Grow? - With "Silver Bells and Cockle Shells?" 

This often repeated line from the Nursery Rhyme is not the reality today.  Instead many of us are relying on Pesticides and Herbicides to Grow our Gardens.  But Research Now Shows Children are Critically Susceptible to Pesticides

According to Michael Jolliffe writing for NaturalNews.com, July 21, 2009 Straight to the Source
 "A new study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives has revealed that children are dangerously vulnerable to the effects of environmental pesticides, and for far longer than originally suspected.Scientists at the University of California, Berkeley have discovered that children lack sufficient levels of the enzyme most responsible for detoxifying pesticides up to the age of seven and possibly for longer. Known as paraxonase or PON1, the enzyme is the most important defense the body has against organophosphate chemicals, a major ingredient of the most commonly used agricultural pesticides..." More details at the following link: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_18621.cfm
-------------------------------------------------------------

PAEP Poster - “Baby Cuddles”

According to the Research of Dr. Philip Landrigan at New York's Mt. Sinai's Children's Environmental Health Center:  "measurable levels of hundreds of manmade chemicals are routinely found in the bodies of all Americans including newborns."   A growing number of harmful compounds are being found in  "everyday household items" and are contributing to the sharp increase in childhood disease and death according to Dr. Landrigan.   Due to increasing levels of polluting chemicals, childhood asthma in pre-schoolers  is up 160% in the past 15 years.  Phthalates - a group of chemicals used to make scent last longer utilized in many scented products in North America - have been linked to hypospadias in newborn baby boys - a deformity of the penis whereby the urethral opening is "misplaced" at the base of the penis.  These infants must endure painful surgery at a very tender age to correct the deformity.   Dr. Landrigan supports and hopes for the passage of the Child Safe Chemical Act (CSCA) that would force chemical manufacturers to undergo rigorous testing to prove the safety of the 62,000 untested chemicals that they are presently flooding into our homes in the form of everyday household items.  Even if  legislation were in place, 62,000 chemicals will not disappear overnight.  As parents we need not wait until our Governments see fit to protect our children from these chemicals.   Our Children deserve  our protection NOW starting in the womb.  WE - Parents, Grandparents, Guardians, and Caregivers HAVE THE POWER to create change and in so doing - create a healthy world for our children.  Nothing brings change faster than a Change in Consumer Buying Habits.  Every time we make a choice to buy "Scent-Free" and more natural products we send a resounding message to Chemical Manufacturers on behalf of our kids - that we intend to have - "Chem-Free Kids".  To quote Dr. Landrigan: "Children are 30 % of our population but they are 100% of our Future.  They deserve our protection."   Is there anything more true than these words?

PAEP Poster - "Scent Free Pregnancy"

European families are enjoying a measure of protection from chemicals that is unheard of here in North America since the R.E.A.C.H. program to limit the use of dangerous chemicals was instituted in 2007.   Under the EU strict regulatory law, Manufacturers are compelled to prove each chemical safe before it is permitted entry into Consumer Products.    Here in North America, lax Governments refuse to adopt the “precautionary principal” placing the burden on the Consumer to “prove proof of harm” before a product is forced into withdrawal from the marketplace.  In permitting this situation to exist, North American Governments NOT ONLY FAIL to protect our CHILDREN, but those same governments give preferential treatment to  “Healthy Profits” instead of “Healthy Progeny”. 

PAEP Poster - "Playground"

Children are no longer permitted to take peanuts to school but, generally speaking, they are still permitted to wear "scent" in schools - including chemical fragrances embedded in laundry detergent and fabric softeners.  Scent allergies are no laughing matter.  Allergies to "scent" can trigger asthma attacks or, worst case, an anaphylactic shock.
But Some schools are bucking the trend and have banned "scents" outright.  The reason for this is that "scents" in North America are generally composed of a soup of toxic chemicals that can cause "nausea,  vomiting, dizziness, shortness of breath, and a host of other serious adverse health effects according to research (2008) from the University of Washington conducted by Dr. Anne Steinemann.